Opening page
Opening page
Loading product details
2nd edition, full rebuild · EN+ZH PDFs · 14 figures, 17 tables · three horizons · Accumulate, $201 fully derived
Все зафиксированные выводы, критерии проверки и правки сохраняются полностью. У связанных отчетов могут быть более новые редакции; исторические выводы читайте с учетом даты регистрации и примечаний о правках.
The growth engine has shifted from volume to price. Net dollar retention, at 157% after four consecutive quarterly increases, is the earliest observable indicator; its shift is expected to precede a revenue slowdown by about 12 months.
NDR stays below 140 for two consecutive quarters while revenue growth has not yet slowed, meaning the lead relationship exists but its direction was misread; or NDR remains at least 150 while revenue growth still drops below 70%, falsifying the lead relationship itself.
None (structural judgment)
Доказательства для закрытия пока не зафиксированы.
The current price assumes persistence never seen historically. Reverse DCF implies 32.9% compound growth for ten years, with terminal value accounting for 75%. Positive expected value comes from the right tail, not a margin of safety.
Initial FY2027 growth guidance is at least +55%, confirming the upside path and the start of the previously unprecedented outcome; or the stock falls below $150, returning the implied compound growth rate to the range of comparable precedents.
S&P 500
Доказательства для закрытия пока не зафиксированы.
Overweight. The 12-month target is $214, probability-weighted across $119 / $208 / $320 using an EV/sales engine, or 14.9% above the August 27, 2026 close of $185.93. Base-case revenue of $12.2 billion matches sell-side consensus, with a 40× exit multiple.
NDR stays below 140 for two consecutive quarters, guidance merely meets expectations in a quarter, or US commercial growth falls below 70% without a rating downgrade under the transition rules; or the 12-month absolute return falls below −10%, into the Underweight band.
S&P 500
Voided and re-registered because of a transcription error. This entry used pre-adversarial-audit draft figures: target $214, scenarios $119 / $208 / $320 and upside +14.9%. The audit found that the scenario engine incorrectly used 2.42 billion shares. Recalculation using the actual weighted diluted count of 2.569 billion produced the published target of $201, scenarios $112 / $196 / $302 and upside +8.2%. The correct conclusion was registered as a new entry. This entry is excluded from hit-rate calculation under the ledger rule: do not rewrite history; void and re-register corrections.
Overweight. The 12-month target is $201, probability-weighted across $112 / $196 / $302 using EV/sales and 2.569 billion weighted diluted shares, or 8.2% above the August 27, 2026 close of $185.93. Base revenue of $12.2 billion matches sell-side consensus. A 40× exit EV/sales multiple implies enterprise value; adding net cash and dividing by shares yields equity value per share.
NDR stays below 140 for two consecutive quarters, guidance merely meets expectations in a quarter, or US commercial growth falls below 70% without a rating downgrade under the transition rules; or the 12-month absolute return falls below −10%, into the Underweight band.
S&P 500
Доказательства для закрытия пока не зафиксированы.
Neutral / Hold. The 12-month probability-weighted target is $167 on shares outstanding, or $155 fully diluted. Fundamentals rank among the world's leading software businesses, but 66.8× price-to-sales already assumes near-perfect execution for the next five years.
A 12-month excess return versus the S&P 500 outside the −10% to +5% range makes the rating incorrect.
S&P 500
Superseded by the fully rebuilt second edition before the 12-month window ended. The scenario engine changed from price-to-sales per share to EV/sales and enterprise value, avoiding distortion from a 1.3% tax rate. The rating rose from Neutral to Overweight and the target from $167 to $214. Chapter 18 of v2 explains each difference; the new edition bears the evidentiary burden. The price rose 8.7% over the intervening 10 trading days; the upgrade was not driven by price.
Non-consensus finding 2: the company ended share repurchases in January 2026 after using only 14% of the authorization. Against ample cash and free cash flow approaching a doubling, this is a tacit management statement about its own share price.
This interpretation is falsified if the company resumes buybacks within 12 months and executes them materially, with cumulative execution exceeding 50% of the authorized amount.
Company announcements
Доказательства для закрытия пока не зафиксированы.
The return distribution is highly asymmetric: +40.3% upside versus −48.0% downside, with a heavier left tail. Position sizing, rather than a directional call alone, is the appropriate lens for this stock.
The asymmetry judgment is falsified if realized movements over 12 months are right-skewed, with upside substantially exceeding downside, or if maximum drawdown is materially below 30%.
The stock's own price distribution
The distribution assessment changed with the recalculated engine. The three v2 scenarios produce a right-skewed distribution with +72.3% upside and −35.9% downside, replacing the original heavier left tail of +40.3% / −48.0%. The position-sizing implication remains in the v2 risk-budget framework; the original statement is treated as superseded.
Year-on-year US commercial revenue growth is the thesis's critical variable: staying above 100% supports the bull case; falling below 70% triggers the bear case.
US commercial revenue growth below 70% year over year in any quarter invalidates the base-case assumptions.
Company quarterly earnings reports
Доказательства для закрытия пока не зафиксированы.
Non-consensus finding 1: reversing the deferred-tax valuation allowance will materially increase the reported tax rate at some future point, a factor generally absent from current market earnings forecasts.
If consensus EPS forecasts are not revised down after the company announces a valuation-allowance reversal, the market had already incorporated it and the finding is invalid.
Consensus EPS forecasts
Доказательства для закрытия пока не зафиксированы.
Методика: в таблице показаны все выводы, зафиксированные за период, без какого-либо отбора. Точность = подтвержденные ÷ (подтвержденные + опровергнутые); открытые выводы в знаменатель не входят. Итог определяется по условиям опровержения, указанным в каждом отчете. Прошлые данные и прогнозы не гарантируют будущих результатов. Не является инвестиционной рекомендацией.
Перевод на русский пока недоступен; показана английская версия.
Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) company deep dive, second edition — full rebuild. Two PDFs, Chinese (29 pp) and English (31 pp), each with 18 chapters plus 4 appendices, 14 charts and 17 data tables, figure-for-figure identical; every derived number walked step by step in Appendix D. Reference date: close of 27 August 2026 ($185.93).
| # | Judgement | Key numbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The growth engine is shifting from volume to price, and consumes almost no capital | net dollar retention 157% (four straight rises); FY2025 split: volume +34%, price +16.5%; each new dollar of operating capital returns ~$5/yr after tax |
| 2 | A 1.3% effective tax rate is dressing up earnings and the P/E | normalised at 21%: net income −20%, P/E 148x → 184x; the $3.45bn valuation allowance carries a two-sided break when released |
| 3 | Customer-count disclosure vanished the quarter after growth downshifted | growth printed 45% → 34%, then halted from Q1 2026; a three-step timeline verified across 15 releases |
| 4 | Insiders sold a net $896m in 12 months with zero buys — and the buyback was terminated in January 2026 | Class F pins <5% economics at 49.999999% of votes; two price signals from different filings, one direction |
| 5 | The funding side already rehearsed a fundamentals-free −41% deleveraging this year | Jan–Jun 2026 −41.0% while guidance was raised; β 1.91, IV30 47%, ~$63bn option notional |
| Metric | Reading | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | +92.8%, twelve straight accelerating quarters | weighted peers +30.0% ex-MSFT — a ~63pp spread |
| Rule of 40 | 155 | nothing else in the set above 70 |
| Three order bases | RPO $4.9bn / TCV $3.37bn / RDV $6.24bn (+124%) | not interchangeable; RPO systematically understates the government book — taken apart in the report |
| Reverse-DCF implied growth | 32.9% for ten years, terminal 75% of EV | the price pays for persistence without precedent |
| Net cash | $9.4bn, zero debt | capex 0.7% of revenue; $1.76bn of cloud commitments are the invisible capex |
| Horizon | View |
|---|---|
| Monthly | Earnings vacuum: options price ±13.5% for 30 days ($161–$211) |
| Quarterly | Three Q3 checkpoints: NDR ≥150, a third guidance raise (eight straight beats make in-line a negative catalyst), triple-digit US-commercial TCV/RDV |
| Annual | Accumulate, target $201 (+8.2%): bear $112 (25%) / base $196 (50%) / bull $302 (25%) on an EV/S engine that bypasses the tax distortion; the base case matches sell-side consensus $12.1bn; migration triggers set in advance |
Rebuilt end to end on the seven-stage line: a nine-tile dashboard with multi-period series, a price ladder with the market's implied position and the option ±1σ band, monthly/quarterly/annual horizons, a scenario-to-action operating framework. The rating moves from Neutral to Accumulate and the target from $167 to $201 — not price-driven (ten sessions apart), but engine- and evidence-driven: the scenario engine switched from P/S-per-share to EV/S-enterprise value (bypassing the 1.3%-rate distortion), while NDR at 157% and a second guidance raise confirmed the price lever. The difference is itemised in Chapter 18, and the previous edition's calls remain on the public scorecard — nothing deleted, nothing hidden.
Primary sources: SEC EDGAR (CIK 0001321655) — 10-K, 10-Q, fifteen quarterly releases, DEF 14A and 59 Form 4 filings parsed trade by trade — XBRL companyfacts (full series from 2020), FINRA short interest, CBOE option chains; peers from Snowflake, Datadog, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, C3.ai and BigBear.ai filings. Every claim carries an [A]/[B]/[C]/[D] grade; twelve known limits are listed; every computed figure (normalised P/E, incremental returns, weighted peer growth, reverse DCF, the scenario engine) is reproduced in Appendix D.
Compiled independently by the TopX research team from public information, then reviewed and revised before release by professional investment managers and fund managers with asset-management experience. Reviewers take part in a personal capacity, do not represent their respective employers, and provide no investment advisory services through TopXEA; TopXEA holds no investment-adviser licence in any jurisdiction. Primary filings (SEC, exchanges, company disclosures) are the first-priority source, key figures require corroboration from at least two independent sources, claims carry [A]/[B]/[C]/[D] evidence grades, and known limitations are disclosed item by item inside the report. This is research content — not investment advice — and is not tailored to any investor; historical data and forward projections do not guarantee future results. Digital goods are non-refundable once delivered.
We pulled and read both of Palantir's 20 August Forms 144. A Form 144 is a notice of intent, not a sale; one filing names its 10b5-1 adoption date and the other leaves the field blank — and that field is where all the information sits. Plus a share-count trap that understates price-to-sales by 4.3%.
Same EA, same .set, two different equity curves. We isolated the chart timeframe in a controlled test: 60× the bar count, and every figure in both reports came back identical. The variables that actually move the number are elsewhere — ranked by impact, with our own measured data.
A bitcoin miner books the coins it mines as revenue, but coins are not cash, and the proceeds from selling them can sit in investing activities. Operating cash flow is therefore negative by construction. Using ten quarters of Riot Platforms filings, this piece lays out three lines to read side by side, and explains why a widely quoted non-GAAP figure swings with the bitcoin price.
From early 2025 to June 2026, Applied Optoelectronics raised $1.547bn net by selling stock at the market, 97.3% of its external funding; customers prepaid nothing. This piece rebuilds a sources-and-uses ledger for that money by differencing year-to-date cash-flow figures, flags three places where pulling XBRL tags in bulk gets it wrong and one where the 10-K text reports a single month as a whole round, and compares where the peers found their expansion money. All of it can be reproduced from public filings.